Professor David and Erin Clements discussed their recent revelations at Conservative Daily regarding the companies that provide election systems to individuals and entities involved in US elections.
Recent articles at The Gateway Pundit and here at Joe Hoft.com have presented the functionality of election software that was ignored until recent events in New Mexico surfaced.
The story began when independent investigators in New Mexico identified a software package that was used illegally in the 2020 and 2022 elections. This software was a local version of TotalVote produced by BPro.
We then uncovered that BPro was purchased by KnowInk and its voter system platform is similar to the platforms provided by Tenex Solutions. These systems have numerous flaws.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/03/bpros-totalvote-centralized-state-wide-top-down-system-used-in-multiple-states-is-internet-connected-non-certified-connects-with-dominion-and-eric-and-allows-plug-ins-that-can-change-resu/
Next, it was discovered that Albert Sensors were used to obtain the state’s data in the 2020 Election.
New Mexico’s Secretary of State, Maggie Toulouse Oliver, illegally centralized New Mexico’s elections, exposed them to the internet, processed them on uncertified software, and lied about it to the New Mexico legislature.
Toulouse-Oliver also granted the federal government essentially full access to county election systems through surveillance devices called “Albert Sensors” provided by a private, non-profit called Center for Internet Security (CIS). Coincidentally, CIS is a main player in the censorship scheme carried out by our own federal government, Democrat non-profits, big tech, and state election officials to silence Americans’ concerns about the 2020 election.
Professor David Clements and his wife Erin Clements discussed these election systems on the Conservative Daily podcast on Monday.
Here are some highlights from their analysis of these systems.
- The four firms that they mention, KnowInk which purchased BPro, Tenex Solutions and VR Systems combined cover much of the US election activities and they all have the same ecosystem.
- The chart showing censorship between Big Tech and government of conservative media was provided in Congress.
- The same entities involved in elections are also involved in the censorship scheme uncovered by Florida Rep. Anna Paulina Luna in the House meeting with Twitter executives.
- The CIS is housed between the Department of Homeland Security and far-left groups that hate conservatives. Their function is to obtain data from any location that they set up Albert Sensors and secondly to provide bogus certifications to “non-voting election technology” like that promoted by the four firms noted above.
- The CIS non-profit also partners with the NASS and NASD (National Associations of Secretaries of State and State Elections Directors).
- Erin Clements: “The radical left and the part of the government that hates you essentially controls our elections and we don’t even know it.”
- There’s no evidence that the CIS provides feedback to the entities they are surveilling using Albert Sensors. No reports have been provided to show this is not the case. The use of the CIS also permits the participants to get around FOIA or records requests and keep all their activities secret and non-transparent.
- The below slide shows that non-voting technology (BPro, etc) controls almost the entire election.
- Complete centralization is already almost a reality in many states and is a violation of HAVA in several respects.
- The CIS has access to source code for the centralized software systems but the CIS has no congressional mandate for its activities.
Kris Jurski looked over the election data in Florida with a focus on voter rolls. His work identified numerous issues with the records in the voter rolls where records were changed, deleted, or reinserted in large batches that are impossible to explain. For example, more than 200,000 voters were deleted from voter rolls in November and December of 2022 in Florida after the primary, and yet only 20,000 were deleted on average the six months prior.
This relationship between bogus voter rolls and the “Election Censorship Complex” is the topic of the next post in this series.
See the video below.